| 1. | Purpose: | To define the procedure for stability studies. | ||
| 2. | Scope: | This guideline is applicable to the stability studies carried out for,
|
||
| 3. |
|
|||
| 3.1 | References: | |||
| 3.1.1 | ICH Q1A (R2): Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products. | |||
| 3.1.2 | ICH Q1F: Stability Data Package for Registration Applications in Climatic Zones III and IV | |||
| 3.1.3 | WHO Technical Report Series, No. 863, Annex 5. | |||
| 3.2 | Attachments: | |||
| 3.2.1 |
|
Format for stability sampling (routine & non routine) register. | ||
|
|
|
Format for stability test request. | ||
|
|
|
Examples of dosage forms & tests to be performed
for drug product & drug substance. |
||
|
|
|
Stability study schedule & cycle. | ||
|
|
|
Format for master stability schedule. | ||
|
|
|
Format for stability sample label. | ||
|
|
|
Format for monthly stability schedule. | ||
|
|
|
Format for stability protocol issuance register. | ||
|
|
|
Format for ACC/long term stability summary report. | ||
|
|
|
Format for stability discontinuation authorization. | ||
|
|
|
Format for master stability schedule (computerized). | ||
|
|
|
Format for stability sample reconciliation & destruction. | ||
| 4. Responsibilities: | ||||
|
|
||||
|
Corporate Quality: | |||
|
To review stability data received from locations. | |||
|
To provide suggestions to location QC incase of stability failures. | |||
|
|
||||
|
Quality Assurance: | |||
|
To prepare stability schedule. | |||
|
To approve the stability protocol. | |||
|
To withdraw the stability samples. | |||
|
To send the samples to QC along with stability test request. | |||
|
To maintain the related documents. | |||
|
|
||||
|
Quality Control: | |||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
4.3.1.1 | To receive, schedule, incubate & analyze the stability samples. | ||
|
|
4.3.1.2 | To inform stability failure results to QC head, if any. | ||
|
|
4.3.1.3 | To prepare & update the stability summary report. | ||
|
|
4.3.1.4 | To maintain stability documents along with raw data. | ||
|
|
||||
|
Head QC: | |||
|
|
4.3.2.1 | To monitor the stability program. | ||
|
|
4.3.2.2 | To approve the stability protocol. | ||
|
|
4.3.2.3 | To issue the stability protocol. | ||
|
|
4.3.2.4 | To initiate investigation incase of out of specification (OOS) results. | ||
|
|
4.3.2.5 | To authorize deviation if any. | ||
|
|
4.3.2.6 | To authorize stability discontinuation if any. | ||
|
|
4.3.2.7 | To approve the stability summary report. | ||
|
|
4.3.2.8 | To inform about stability failure to head quality, location & regulatory. | ||
|
|
4.3.2.9 | To take necessary actions incase of significant change or failure. | ||
|
|
||||
|
Head Quality, Head location & regulatory: | |||
|
To approve the stability protocol. | |||
|
To provide suggestions incase of stability failures or significant changes. | |||
|
|
||||
| NOTE : RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX SHALL BE CHANGED AS PER THE EXISTING ORGANGRAM OF THE LOCATION. | ||||
| 5. Definition of terms: | |||
|
|
|||
| 5.1 | Stability: | ||
| The term with respect to a drug dosage form refers to the chemical & physical integrity of the dosage unit & when appropriate, the ability of the dosage unit to maintain protection against microbial contamination. | |||
|
|
|||
| 5.2 | ICH: | ||
| The International Conference on Harmonization. | |||
|
|
|||
| 5.3 | Significant change for drug product: | ||
|
A 5 percent change in assay from its initial value, or failure to meet the acceptance criteria for potency when using biological or immunological procedures. | ||
|
Any degradation product’s exceeding its acceptance criterion. | ||
|
Failure to meet acceptance criteria for appearance, physical attributes and functionality test (e.g. color, phase separation, resuspendibility, caking, hardness, dose delivery per actuation). However, some changes in physical attributes (e.g., softening of suppositories, melting of creams) may be expected under accelerated conditions. | ||
|
Failure to meet the acceptance criterion for pH. | ||
|
Failure to meet the acceptance criteria for dissolution for 12 dosage units (USP stage 2). | ||
|
|
|||
| 5.4 | Significant change for drug substance: | ||
|
Significant change for a drug substance is defined as failure to meet its specification. | ||
| 5.5 | Intermediate / Intermediate stage material: | ||
|
A material produced during API processing that undergoes further molecular change or purification before it becomes the API. | ||
|
|
|||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| 6.1 | Purpose of Stability Study: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| The purpose of stability testing is to provide evidence on how the quality of a drug substance or drug product varies with the time under influence of a variety of environmental factors such as temperature, humidity and light, air & to establish a retest period for the drug substance or a shelf life for the drug product & recommended storage conditions. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 6.2 | Climatic Zones: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| 6.3 | Factors affecting stability of the product: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Improper storage condition like, | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Temperature:
Freezing may either break or cause a large increase in the droplet size of emulsions, it can denature proteins & in rare cases it can cause less soluble polymorphic states of some drugs to form some dissolved carboxylic acid loses carbon dioxide from the carboxyl group when heated. The resulting product has reduced pharmacological potency. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Light:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Air:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Humidity (Moisture):
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Change in formulation. | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Change in primary pkg. material. | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Change in batch size. | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Change in process or critical process parameters. | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Change in critical mfg. equipment. | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Change in vendor of API and/or critical raw material | |||||||||||||||||||
| 6.4 | Criteria for acceptable level of stability:
Note: Where, “Significant change/ failure” occurs due to accelerated testing during six months, additional testing at an intermediate condition should be conducted. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| 6.5 | Types of stability studies:
@Note : If 30 + 2° C at 65 + 5 % RH is the long-term condition, there is no intermediate condition.
be, 25°C + 2°C & 60% + 5% RH.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.1 | Criteria for deciding type of stability study to be performed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Routine stability study: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
7.1.1.1 | In case of routine stability, samples of one batch per product per year shall be kept for long-term stability study. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Non routine stability study: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Following are the examples of non-routine stability study. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
7.1.2.1 | Incase of new product after successful scale-up (i.e. only qty. adjustment or process adjustment is permitted during scale-up), samples of three consecutive batches/validation batches shall be kept for ACC & long-term stability. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
7.1.2.2 | Incase of drug product manufacturing; hold time/stability study at intermediate stage shall be performed while manufacturing of exhibit batch or process validation batch.
E.g. Hold time study of, * Blend/lubricated material. * Compressed tablets (Uncoated tablets)/Coated tablets. * Unfiltered / Filtered bulk. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
7.1.2.3 | Incase of drug substance manufacturing; hold time/stability study of intermediate stage material shall be performed. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
7.1.2.4 | Three consecutive batches means: Three batches of a product X manufactured can have batch numbers X-001, X-005 & X-007, where, in-between batch numbers can be of any other product | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
7.1.2.5 | Stability studies shall be performed on each individual strength and container/pack size of the drug product unless bracketing or matrixing is applied. i.e. If the product is packed in three different size (100 count, 500 count & 1000 count) of container/bottle/jar, stability study for all three pack size shall be done. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
7.1.2.6 | Stability study of evaluation batch means, recovery added batch, reprocessed batch, recommendation in temporary or permanent change control or incidence report etc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
7.1.2.7 | In case if the scale up is not successful or major changes done, 3M ACC or ACC & CRT stability or stability study as per recommendation in temporary or permanent change shall be done. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
7.1.2.8 | Photostability studies shall be done as per regulatory requirement of respective country and/or labeling statement. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.2 | Sampling for stability studies: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
QA shall inform QC regarding type of stability study to be performed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
QC shall calculate the sample quantity and shall inform to QA. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Total sample quantity per batch shall be 1.5 times the quantity required for single complete or partial analysis & based on number of stations plus additional two stations (since stability testing has to be continued for 12 month beyond the expiry). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
In case of drug products (formulation), QA shall withdraw random samples through out packaging of the batch (to have representative samples of the entire batch) after verifying according to in process checks & FP results within limit & in the final pack so as to simulate the market pack. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
In case of drug substance (API), QA shall withdraw stability samples at the time of finished product sampling and pack in such a way so as to simulate market pack and shall ensure the FP results within limit before incubation of the samples. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
After withdrawal of the samples, QA shall enter the details like, sr. no., product name, batch no., date of sample withdrawal shall be mentioned in stability (routine & non routine) sampling register (Attachment – 1). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
QA shall mention qty. of sample, sampled by & date & purpose, in batch manufacturing document. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
QA shall enter the details like, Sr. no., product name, batch no., manufacturing date, expiry date, storage condition, purpose, stability condition, test request for, sampled by & date, sample qty., in the “stability test request form” (Attachment – 2) in duplicate & send samples to QC. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preparation of stability protocol | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Stability protocol of each product shall be prepared by quality control referring examples of dosage forms & tests to be performed (Attachment –3), stability study schedule & cycle (Attachment – 4). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Protocol shall be checked by location – QA and department head and approved by quality-head, factory-head and regulatory head. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Receipt & storage of stability samples | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
On receipt of stability samples, QC chemist shall verify the sample details against the stability test request form and shall return the form duly signed in received by and date & retain a copy of the same. (Attachment-2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Details like, sr. no., sample received by & date, product, batch no., manufacturing date, expiry date, purpose of stability, stability condition, qty. of sample, shall be mentioned in the master stability schedule (Attachment – 5). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Sr. no., product, batch no., stability condition, stability station, ref. Page no. of master stability schedule, due date, analyzed by & date, analysis ref. Document no., checked by, remark shall be mentioned in monthly stability schedule on weekly basis(Attachment- 7). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Sr. no., product, batch no., mfg. date, exp. date, purpose, stability condition, shall be mentioned in computerized master stability schedule. (Attachment- 11). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Stability coordinator shall verify entries made in all three (master stability schedule, monthly stability schedule & computerized master stability schedule) documents. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Samples shall be stored as per labeled storage condition until incubation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Incubation of stability samples: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Stability coordinator shall ensure that batches planned for stability study pass in all tests as per the finished product specifications. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Sample quantity shall be divided according to the sample required per study for accelerated and long term conditions & shall be labeled as per attachment –6. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Samples shall be incubated as per below guideline.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
After incubation of samples, date of incubation, analysis due date at required stations with ref. Page no. of monthly stability schedule shall be mentioned in attachment -5. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Temp. & Humidity of stability incubator shall be monitored on daily basis. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
If incubation of the stability samples is delayed by 30 days or more, initial (0 month) analysis shall be done again before incubation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Incase if ACC stability oven is out of order, samples shall be transferred at required stability condition within 24 hrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Incase if CRT stability oven is out of order, samples shall be transferred at required stability condition within 72 hrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Incase of 2-8°C CRT condition, if the stability chamber (which may be cold room/refrigerator) is out of order, samples shall be transferred at required stability condition within 72 hrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Incase of intermediate stage material, stability shall be done only for long term condition & shall be considered valid until further change in mfg. process is done. (Applicable to API mfg. location). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Analysis for due stability stations shall be planned referring monthly stability schedule verified by head QC. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Head QC or designee shall arrange for the issuance of stability protocol & shall mention issuance no., product, batch no., due station, protocol no., issued on, issued by, issued to, retrieved on & remarks if any in protocol issuance register (Attachment -8). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Stability coordinator shall withdraw the stability samples from the incubator at the time of analysis & shall mention qty., date & initial below the due month. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Qty. withdrawn, withdrawn by & date shall be mentioned in the next row in the master stability schedule (Attachment – 5) at the time of sample withdrawal. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Stability coordinator shall also make entry of sample withdrawn in “Stability Sample Reconciliation and Destruction Form” for “Qty. Drawn”, “Qty. Drawn Date / By”, “Station No./ Due on”, “Qty. Balance”, “Remarks”. (Attachment – 12). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Chemist shall ensure the availability of standards of all the related substances/ degradant required for the analysis, either from the Research & Development or Pharmacopoeia l commissions. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
If at the time of initial analysis, analytical method was not stability indicating, stability sample at next station shall be analyzed as per stability indicating method. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Chemist shall analyze the samples as per the test procedures given in the issued stability protocol and enter the data in the protocol during analysis. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Analysis of samples shall be completed within below tolerance limit from due date.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
In case of delay in analysis, authorization in deviation form shall be taken from dept. head. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Chemist shall attach the chromatograms, TLC plates, UV spectra etc. with the protocol & analytical report. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Chemist shall ensure that actual values of the test results are reported instead of complies or confirms. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Chemist shall give the protocol (which includes analytical report & summary sheet) along with raw data for the cross checking to the designated person and then to the Head-QC for the approval. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Product name, batch no., mfg. date, exp. date, dosage form (where applicable), pack size, primary pkg. Material, storage condition, purpose of stability, test results, master protocol number shall be mentioned by the chemist in the stability summary report (Attachment – 9) which is part of stability protocol. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Approved document (analytical report, protocol & raw data) shall be filed in a respective product stability data file. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
In case of delay in analysis, real time of analysis in month (nearer to start / end of the month) shall be mentioned in summary report.
e.g if 6M station was due on 05/10/05 & analysis done on 14/10/05 (i.e before 15/10/05), 7M station shall be reported. e.g if 6M station was due on 05/10/05 & analysis done on 17/10/05 (i.e after 15/10/05), 8M station shall be reported. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Handling of OOS (out of specification)/out of trend /failure results or significant change: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Any out of the specification results shall be intimated to the Head-QC. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Head -QC shall investigate the out of specification (OOS) results according to the SOP. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
In event of any stability failure/ significant change (Out of trend results), Head QC shall inform to location head, location quality head, , regulatory & CQ and shall suggest, (but not limited to) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
OR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
In case of stability of intermediate stage material, if fails at any station, stability of material of next lot shall be studied for in-between period (between two stations). For example, if material fails at 90 days station and earlier station is 60 days, stability of next lot shall be studied in between period i.e. at 45 days. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stability sample reconciliation & destruction: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
After completion of stability study, stability coordinator shall reconcile the stability samples and shall make necessary entries for the destruction of the samples in “Stability Sample Reconciliation and Destruction Form” (Attachment – 12). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Handling of changes in specification or test procedure: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Condition 1: Specification changes but test procedure doesn’t change, If
next stability station. Pass: Take Change control and revise the stability protocol Fail: Trigger process change, keep stability samples with new process, and continue old stability with old specification. Method validation: Not required if LOD, LOQ & linearity are established below the revised limit. Otherwise required. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Condition 2: Specification doesn’t change but test procedure changes, if
next stability station with validated method, Pass: Take Change control and revise the stability protocol Fail: Trigger process change, keep stability samples with new process, continue old stability with old test procedure Method validation: Required. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Condition 3: Specification and test procedure both change, If next
stability station with validated method, Pass: Take Change control and revise the stability protocol Fail: Trigger process change, keep stability samples with new process, and continue old stability with old specification and test procedure Method validation: Required. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Discontinuation of study: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
In case of discontinuation of stability study, QA shall mention product, batch no, stability condition, reason for discontinuation, reference, and take authorization from quality head and send intimation to QC for the discontinuation of study. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Chemist shall mention remaining stability station, qty. to be destroyed, reason for destruction, destruction procedure to be followed, remarks if any & shall get authorization from Head-QC in (Attachment – 10). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Chemist shall destroy the remaining samples & mention qty. destroyed, date of destruction & destruction procedure in the (Attachment – 10). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Necessary entries shall also be made in sample reconciliation & destruction form. (Attachment –12). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Strategy for stability, in the cases of product transfers: | |||||||
|
|
||||||||
| 7.14.1 | While product transfer, location A shall send all the samples along with stability schedule to location B. | |||||||
| 7.14.2 | Location B will charge the stability samples and continue stability as per the location A’s schedule. | |||||||
| 7.14.3 | The location B shall continue keeping stability of new batches (one batch per year) as per the system and scale up batch stability as per GMP norms. | |||||||
| 7.14.4 | Further, there will be three situations in case of product registration for export purpose. | |||||||
| 7.14.5 | Case 1: If Product is already registered for export from location A and transferred at Location B
|
|||||||
| 7.14.6 | Case 2: Export registration of new product (which is already there in domestic at location B), and if product is decided to be registered from location A.
|
|||||||
| 7.14.7 | Case 3: Export registration of new product (which is already there in domestic at location A and transferred to location B within the 3 month of stability program), then it is advisable to registered from location A.
|
|||||||
| 8.Guideline History: | ||||||||
| Guideline No. | Effective Date | Super-sedes | Supersedes
Date |
Reason For Revision | ||||
| 031/02R1 | 15.09.05 | 00031/02 | 20.11.03 |
|
||||
| Guide-line No. | Effective Date | Super-sedes | Supersedes
Date |
Reason For Revision |
| 031/02R1 | 15.09.05 | 00031/02 | 20.11.03 |
|
| Prepared by: Approved by:
Date: Date: |
||||
ATTACHMENT –1
- Format for STABILITY SAMPLING REGISTER (ROUTINE & NON ROUTINE)- YEAR 2005
| Sr. No. | Product | B. No. | Type of stability | Sample withdrawn on | Sample withdrawn by | Remarks /Reason for stability | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Routine | Non routine | ||||||||||
ATTACHMENT-2
-
Format of STABILITY TEST REQUEST
FROM : QA
TO : QC
DATE :
- NO. :
PRODUCT :
B.NO. :
MFG. DATE :
EXP. DATE :
STORAGE CONDITION :
TYPE OF STABILITY/PURPOSE : {Routine / Non routine (deviation/validation/
recovery/new product)}
(Give ref. Document no. incase of
non routine stability study)
STABILITY CONDITION :
TEST REQUEST FOR :
(mention name of tests incase of non routine stability)
SAMPLED BY(QA)/DATE :
SAMPLE QTY. :
SAMPLE RECEIVED BY(QC) :
DATE :
ATTACHMENT – 4
-
STABILITY STUDY SCHEDULE & CYCLE
Time points for Accelerated stability: 0,1,2,3 and 6 Months.
Time points for Intermediate stability: 3, 6, 9, 12 Months.
Time points for Long-term stability for formulation: 0,3,6,9,12,18,24,36,48,60, 66 & 72 Months depending upon expiry.
Depending upon the expiry period, stability testing has to be continued for 12 month beyond the expiry.
Time points for Long-term stability for API: 0,3,6,9,12,18,24,36,48,60, 66 & 72 Months.
Time points for Intermediates stage materials stability (At ambient temperature): 0,1,2,3,6,9,12 months.
ATTACHMENT – 6
-
Format for STABILITY SAMPLE LABEL
| PRODUCT | : |
| B. NO. | : |
| STORAGE AT | : |
| KEPT ON | : |
| Qty./STATION | : |
- ________________________________________________________________________________
- ATTACHMENT – 7
-
Format for MONTHLY STABILITY SCHEDULE
Month : July Year: 2001
| Sr. No. | Product | Batch No. | Stability Condition | Stability station | Ref. page No. of master stability schedule | Due Date | Analyzed by/Date | Analysis reference document no. | Checked by | Remark |
| 15 | ABCD | K-005 | ACC (40°C / 75 % RH) | 1M | 01 | 18/7/01 | MNP / 20/7/01 | MNP / 032/ 01 | PKN | |
- ATTACHMENT – 8
-
Format for STABILITY PROTOCOL ISSUANCE REGISTER
| Issuance No. | Product | Batch No. | Due Station | Protocol No. | Issued on | Issued by | Issued to | Retrieved on | Remarks |
ATTACHMENT – 9
-
Format of ACC/LONG TERM STABILITY SUMMARY REPORT
Product name: Batch No.:
Mfg. dt.: Exp.dt.:
API lot /A. R. number:
Dosage form: Batch size:
Pack size:
Primary packaging material: Storage condition:
Purpose of the study:
|
Specification | ACC/LONG TERM Stability station (month) | ||||||
| Initial | **Month | **Month | Month | Month | ||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | ||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Remarks:
Entered by: Checked by:
** 1Month & 2M stations will be applicable to only ACC condition.
-
ATTACHMENT – 10
-
Format for STABILITY DISCONTINUATION AUTHORIZATION
| FROM : QUALITY ASSURANCE | TO : HEAD QUALITY CONTROL | |||||||||||||
| PL. DISCONTINUE THE STABILITY STUDY OF PRODUCT & B. NO. AS MENTIONED BELOW. | ||||||||||||||
| PRODUCT: | BATCH NO: | STABILITY
CONDITION: |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| PREPARED BY : AUTHORIZED BY : RECEIVED BY : (QA) (Head Quality) (QC) | ||||||||||||||
| To be filled in by QC | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| PREPARED BY | : | DATE | : | |||||||||||
| AUTHORIZED BY | (Head QC) | : | DATE | : | ||||||||||
- ATTACHMENT – 3
EXAMPLES OF DOSAGE FORMS & TESTS TO BE PERFORMED
FOR DRUG PRODUCT & DRUG SUBSTANCE
- The stability evaluation parameters shall be selected from the below table but shall not be limited to the table.
- Additional important parameter may be considered based on product & its dosage and any of the below tests may be excluded with scientific rational.
| Drug product (Dosage Form) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Appearance | Viscosity | Odor | Dissolu-tion /Solubility | Hard-ness &/or friability | Related substances / chromatogra-phic purity | pH | Clarity/ Colour / %T | LOD/ Water/ mois-ture | Assay (including preservative/ antioxidant) | Sterility | BET | PET | PMT | MLT | ||||||||||||||||
|
Yes | — | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | — | — | Yes | Yes | — | — | — | — | Yes | |||||||||||||||
| Capsule | Yes | — | Yes | Yes | — | Yes | — | — | Yes | Yes | — | — | — | — | Yes | |||||||||||||||
| Soft gel capsule | Yes | — | Yes | Yes | — | Yes | Yes | — | — | Yes | — | — | — | — | Yes | |||||||||||||||
| Oral liquid/ Suspension | Yes | — | Yes | — | — | Yes | Yes | — | — | Yes | — | — | — | — | Yes | |||||||||||||||
| Cream/ ointment | Yes | Yes | — | — | — | Yes | Yes | — | — | Yes | — | — | Yes | — | Yes | |||||||||||||||
| Nasal sprays /Inhalers (including DPI) | Yes | — | — | — | — | Yes | Yes | Yes | yes | Yes | — | — | — | Yes | Yes | |||||||||||||||
| Injection | Yes | Yes | Yes | — | — | Yes | Yes | Yes | — | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | — | |||||||||||||||
| Lyophilized product | Yes | — | — | — | — | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | — | |||||||||||||||
| Eye drops | Yes | Yes | Yes | — | — | Yes | Yes | Yes | — | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | — | |||||||||||||||
| Non sterile API | Yes | — | — | yes | — | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | — | — | — | — | Yes | |||||||||||||||
| Sterile API | Yes | — | — | yes | — | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
- Identify any unknown impurity if observed out of limit at any station.
- Appearance includes coating integrity (incase of coated tablet) & brittleness incase of hard gelatin capsules, precipitation & cloudiness of content incase of soft gelatin capsules.
- Metered dose inhaler should include dose content uniformity, extractable/leachable
- Reconstitution time test should be done for lyophilized products.
- PET : preservative efficacy test. BET : Bacterial endotoxin test. PMT : Particulate matter test. MLT: Microbiological limit test.
ATTACHMENT – 5
- Format of MASTER STABILITY SCHEDULE
| Sr. No. | Sample received by /Date | Product | B. No. | Mfg. Date | Exp. Date | Purpose | Stability condition | Sample Qty. | Sample incub-ated on | Rem-ark | Stability Station | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 24 | 36 | 48 | 60 | 72 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 432 | MNP / 16/6/01 | ABCD | K-005 | 06/01 | 04/03 | New product | ACC (40°C/75%RH) | XY vials | 18/6/01 | Nil | 18/7/01 / 01* | 18/8/01 / 31* | 18/9/01/61* | 18/12/01/ 78* | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |||||||||||||||||
| Qty. withdrawn, date & initial —–🡪 | 10 vials/ 20/7/01 /MNP | 10 vials/ 18/8/01 /MNP | 10 vials/ 20/9/01 /MNP | 10 vials/ 20/12/01 /MNP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- are ref. Page no. of monthly stability schedule.
ATTACHMENT – 11
- Format for MASTER STABILITY SCHEDULE (Computerized)
| Sr. No. | Name of product | B. No. | Mfg. Date | Exp. Date | Purp-ose | Stability condi-tion | Sample kept on | Stability Station | Remarks | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 24 | 36 | 48 | 60 | 72 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- ATTACHMENT – 12
- STABILITY SAMPLE RECONCILIATION AND DESTRUCTION FORM
| Product | : | Product | : | |||||||||
| B. No. | : | B. No. | : | |||||||||
| Quantity | : | Kept On | : | Quantity | : | Kept On | : | |||||
| Condition | : | Condition | : | |||||||||
| Qty. Drawn |
|
|
Qty. Balance |
|
Qty Drawn |
|
Station | Qty. Balance |
|
|||||
|
|
No. | Due on |
|
|
No. | Due on | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Remaining Sample destroyed by: ______ Date: _____ Remaining Sample destroyed by: ________ Date: _______
